CHINA SHOULD KNOW THAT IT IS A VERY SMALL COUNTRY WITH LESS LAND

THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS THAT TIBET WANTS FREEDOM FROM CHINA .

 

MOREOVER TIBET WAS ALWAYS A DISPUTED LAND.

CHINA HAS NEVER RESPECTED BUDDHISM.

 

Religious suppression

  • Since 1949, the Chinese have destroyed over 6,000 Tibetan Buddhist monasteries and shrines.
  • By 1978 only 8 monasteries and 970 monks and nuns remained in the TAR.
  • The number of monks and nuns allowed to enter monasteries and nunneries is limited. Any reference or images of the Dalai Lama are banned.
  • The Chinese government places officials in every monastery to monitor and often to control religious activity.

 

 

TIBET IS NOT A PART OF CHINA.

LIKE TIBET MANY PARTS OF PRESENT CHINA HAVE DISPUTED LANDS.

YUNNAN – BURMA DISPUTE

XINJIANG –TAJIKISTAN DISPUTE

INNER MONGOLIA LAND DISPUTE

HEILONGJIANG LAND DISPUTE

GUANGXI LAND DISPUTE

 

INDIA HAS ALWAYS RESPECTED BUDDHISM AND HAVE ALWAYS TRIED TO PROTECT TIBET FROM CHINA

https://www.google.co.in/search?q=dalai+lama+in+india&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=IUGyU5jtOM61uASyw4K4Bg&sqi=2&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1517&bih=741&dpr=0.9

PICS OF TIBETANS   PROTESTING IN INDIA.

CHINA SHOULD KNOW THAT FROM ALL SIDES IT HAS DISPUTED LANDS SO IF A INTERNATIONAL MAP OF CHINA IS MADE BY MANY COUNTRIES THEN CHINA WILL REALISE THAT IT IS A VERY SMALL COUNTRY WITH A LIMITED LAND.

ORGANISATIONS IN INDIA WILL ALWAYS FIGHT FOR A FREE TIBET .

https://www.google.co.in/search?q=dalai+lama+in+india&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=IUGyU5jtOM61uASyw4K4Bg&sqi=2&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1517&bih=741&dpr=0.9#q=FREE+TIBET&tbm=isch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_a_Free_Tibet

Students for a Free Tibet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
Students for a Free Tibet
SFT logo.jpg
Type Non-profit
Founded 1994
Headquarters
Method(s) Tibetan independencehuman rightsreligious freedom
Website http://studentsforafreetibet.org

Students for a Free Tibet members protested against China in front of the White House

Students for a Free Tibet Protesters marched to Lafayette Park from the Chinese Embassy inWashington D.C.

Students For a Free Tibet is a global grass roots network of students and activists working in solidarity with the Tibetan people for human rights and freedom. The group uses educationadvocacy, and nonviolent direct action with the goal of achieving Tibetan independence. SFT advocates self-determination for Tibet because of Tibet’s historical status as well as opposing the Chinese government’s violation of the Tibetan people’s human rights, cultural heritage, environment, language and religion.[1]

 

 

History[edit]

Students for a Free Tibet (SFT) was founded in 1994 by pro-independence Tibetans, supporters, and students in New York City to use the influence of youth in order to press for human rights and independence in Tibet. Initially, SFT’s activities were focused on raising awareness amongst fellow students and young people on campuses and at events such as the 1994Lollapalooza music tour. Students for a Free Tibet’s profile and membership grew with the advent of the Tibetan Freedom Concerts, which provided a vehicle for youth involvement in the Tibetan independence movement.

Currently, SFT is an international network of more than 650 chapters at universities, colleges, high schools and communities in over 100 countries. SFT’s International Headquarters remains in New York City. There are also a few satellite offices and organizing hubs; SFT Canada has an office in TorontoOntario,[2] SFT India has an office in Dharamsala,[3] India and SFT UK has an office in London.[4]

Programs[edit]

SFT’s campaigns focus on three areas: political, economic and human rights. SFT’s political campaigns are focused on generally advocating for Tibetan independence by pressuring both Chinese officials as well as SFT members’ government representatives. SFT is well known for high profile protests against Chinese dignitaries when they visit foreign countries. SFT’s human rights campaigns are focused on improving the situation for Tibetans in Tibet by advocating for increased freedoms and rights, and for the release of political prisoners and dissidents. But its website maintains, “When we say ‘Free Tibet’ we don’t just mean, ‘Make things better in Tibet.’ We mean ‘Free the nation of Tibet from Chinese occupation.'”[5]

The stated long-term goal for SFT’s economic campaign is to make Tibet “too costly for the Chinese government to maintain.”[6] One such campaign, held in conjunction with other organizations which promote regime change in China, urged consumers not to buy products “made in China“.[7] The American media commented on the extreme difficulty of such an endeavor;[8] a commentator from the Christian Science Monitor expressed her belief that “the solutions to those concerns and others lie in turning toward China, rather than away.”[9]

Students for a Free Tibet’s “Leadership Training” is focused on developing representatives for the Tibetan independence movement. Part of this is the annual “Free Tibet! Action Camp” at which dozens of young people gather for a week-long activism training session.

Actions[edit]

Students for a Free Tibet is perhaps best known for its high profile actions on Mount Everest, the Great Wall of China, and on the Golden Gate Bridge. In March and April 2008, the group’s participation in organizing protests and disrupting the Olympic torch relay was criticized by many Chinese nationals. Nevertheless, it succeeded in focusing international attention on the worsening religious, cultural and political situation in Tibet.

In 2000, SFT and other Tibetan independence groups controversially launched complaints to the World Bank against the implementation of its loan in 1999 for the China Western Poverty Reduction Project.[10] The groups claimed that the project, to provide irrigation, land improvement, and construction of basic roads to inaccessible mountainous and semi-arid areas in central and western China,[11] would push Chinese migration into Qinghai and “suffocate the Tibetan way of life there”. In response, the World Bank presidentproposed to delay the project for “deeper environmental review”, but China withdrew its application to fund the project with its own resources.[10] The Chinese Executive Director criticized the groups, saying “We regret that because of political opposition… the World Bank has lost a good opportunity to assist some of the poorest people… in the world”.[12]

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s